movies, Reviews

Double Feature


Thor had a movie weekend, getting treated to The Pirates Band of Misfits in 3-D and The Avengers in plain old D.  Grandma and I took him to the former, and the latter was a BFamily outing.  I am happy to say I enjoyed both, though The Avengers has already placed itself as movie of the year for me.

Pirates, coming from the mastermind behind Wallace and Gromit is a good-natured morality tale about the importance of loyalty and friendship.  I adored the daft hero, voiced by Hugh Grant, and loved that the super villain was none other than Queen Victoria herself.  Thor laughed out loud several times, and so did I.  There was plenty of humor for the grown-ups, without breaking the 4th wall as the Shrek movies are wont to do.  We left the theater happy, and happy to talk about what we’d just seen.

We left The Avengers cheering, and Thor has gone to bed talking about what kinds of things he would smash, were he The Hulk.  Y’all, five minutes in and I leaned over to B yodeling, “This is everything I wanted The Hunger Games to be!  Why couldn’t Joss Whedon have directed that?!”

I clapped.  I cheered.  I squealed.  I scrunched up in my seat and said, “oof!”  I found myself sitting forward, hands on my armrests, eyes wide, mouth open, waiting for the next scene to come, and I thought, “I never want this to end!  Ever!”

Since I have nothing bad to say about the movie, I’ll just list my favorite things:

  1. RDJ and Goop have amazing chemistry.  Amazing.  I would pay to watch a movie that was just the two of them flirting with each other.  I would.
  2. RDJ.  75% of what was wonderful about this movie was Tony Stark, and 100% of what is wonderful about Tony Stark is RDJ.
  3. I love The Hulk.  I grew up watching the Bill Bixby tv show, and I was not disappointed by this movie version of the mild scientist you shouldn’t make angry.  And when Hulk smashes?  When Hulk smashed, my heart grew two sizes.
  4. The dialog was snappy and snarky, and just as well done as the engaging CGI.  It isn’t often that an action movie’s dialog can live up to the great action sequences, but you could have taken out the action and had a great movie, and you could have taken out the dialog and had a–  Actually, the dialog built the movie up.
  5. Joss Whedon.
  6. Thor and Loki.  I love everything about Thor and Loki.  Tom Hiddleston is a brilliant villain.  Chris Hemsworth is a brilliant dumb-jock-god.
  7. Everything about The Avengers.  Twice.  And again.

 

movies, Reviews

Still Hungry


Saw the Hunger Games movie last night. Herein lies my review.

I loved the Hunger Games series of books. No lie, flat out loved them. I loved the strong female characters, the strong characters period, that integrity and humanity were valued ethics among the major players, and that the people the narrative followed weren’t quitters, or whiners, or screamers, but just dug in their heels and did what needed to be done to get their families, friends, and themselves through to the next day. Katniss Everdeen, Finnick Odair, Johanna Mason, and Haymitch Abernathy will be some of my favorite literary characters into my old age, I think.

I appreciated that the fabricated love triangle, which starts off as a friendship on the cusp of something versus an age-old gratitude forced to present as love, was never the hard focus of any of the books, and that romantic love was never a motivation for Katniss. Gale and Peeta make decisions and act based on their feelings for her, but she is clear and direct with both of them that she does not have the luxury of letting her heart rule–and she has no idea what it would say if she did. Romance is not her priority. Staying alive to keep others alive is her priority.

Even Gale and Peeta have other driving motivations, though. As much as they are written to desire Katniss, they also both have lives and seem perfectly willing to live them without her if needed. Peeta not as much as Gale, but Peeta’s an artist so you can forgive him not being a hunter.

Katniss has strong bonds with other female characters throughout the series. First with Prim, her sister. Then with Rue, who reminds her of her sister. Foxface earns Katniss’s respect and there is the sense that these two could be friends in other circumstances. She forges a strange bond with Effie Trinket and another with her mother. She bonds with Johanna Mason. She trusts Greasy Sae. And save for a short exchange with Rue, never once does she have a discussion with one of these other characters that hinges on whether or not she is in love with a man or what she would need to do to catch herself one. Never once. Do you have any idea how rare that is in literature? A female character who isn’t motivated out of the desire to become someone’s wife? Katniss Everdeen would have been my hero as a teen.

The other women in the series are strong, too. The weakest of them, Katniss’s style team ladies, show their own strengths. And her poor, damaged mother’s old strength shines through now and then–though that woman is just toast emotionally from the get-go. Rue is strong and fearless. Foxface is strong and wily. The cruel female characters are still written as strong people. There are Johanna and heartbreaking Annie Cresta as examples of the strength required and the price paid to make it out of the Hunger Games arenas. Prim only continues to grow. Effie–Effie’s actually one of my favorites, too. She is an example of nature overgrowing nurture, and I couldn’t help feeling a fond pride of her as the series wore on.

The story might not be original, and ask Nicole or me how easy it is to write something and find out five years later that someone else has already published the same darned thing, but it is extremely well written and does not take easy ways out. Characters suffer PTSDs that don’t just disappear. Characters act along their motivations without deterring to help the plot. Characters made ugly decisions. And, when the final chapter comes and it is a couple of decades out from the first book, characters are still dealing with their lives.

The movie didn’t do it for me. If I had gone in without having read the novels, I would have been giggling at some of the direction and choices made in how the story was adapted to fit the big screen. As it were, I just kept leaning over to B and whining, “This is so bad!” I won’t complain about what wasn’t there, though. Books and movies are different things, and you can’t compare an apple to an orange.

Jennifer Lawrence IS Katniss Everdeen, though. She fit the bill perfectly. And the Seam and District 12 were exactly as I had imagined them. The Capitol? Eh. It looked very low budget to me. And the costumes were very low budget.

Woody Harrelson was great as Haymitch, and briefly, Elizabeth Banks did a bang up Effie. Lenny Kravitz can’t act, but he does look good. I was disappointed in his Cinna. No, I was very disappointed in his Cinna.

I did not like the choices they made with directing Prim. Buttercup was the wrong color. Peeta–God bless that tiny Josh Hutcherson. Was every other male in Hollywood busy that day because…no. Lainey, from laineygossip.com, wrote in her excellent review of the film:

Whether it be by necessity or by strategy, by selfish manipulation or compassionate regard, literary Peeta wasn’t a child. In the movie, he’s made to be a child. Or at least I saw him as a child. When they connected on an emotional level in the book, I could understand Katniss’s attraction. Here was a man on the way who had sacrificed for her. Here was someone she finally knew she could trust. Here was someone she was growing to love out of respect – for his courage, for his conviction, for what qualities she lacked that he could bring to their relationship and stand with her on the same level.

What transpires instead, on film, in my mind, is not so much a meeting of different equals, but the bonding of a caregiver for a weaker ward that she must govern. I’m not saying it’s a dealbreaker. But I won’t lie to you and tell you that Peeta delivers. And I like Josh Hutcherson SO MUCH as a person, this is not an easy criticism.

It was a dealbreaker for me. Peeta does not deliver (not necessarily Hutcherson, but Peeta), and I groaned aloud at one point because it played as so freaking twee. That is probably because the story cuts out a huge part of what the stylists and mentor team did to make District 12 unique among the other tributes, and because The Boy with the Bread is never fully explained. Without that, Peeta’s just some lumpy kid from 12, and why should Katniss care?

Here is one criticism I will make of what was missing: Peeta is nearly dead by the end of the first book, and Katniss isn’t too healthy herself. Katniss sees Peeta’s heart monitor stop 3 times as they are being whisked back to the Capitol. Peeta has lost a leg. In the movie, Peeta’s wounds are minor and he’s bouncing around like a jumping jack. That really detracts from the story, and detracts from why the Games are horrible.

Liam Hemsworth as Gale worked for me, but his entrance was so anti-Gale that the character had to rebuild himself. Well, he’s got two more movies to do it, I suppose. But movie Gale isn’t the same guy who would do what is done in book 3. Movie Gale is Book Gale on some really good meds. Still, Hemsworth is as perfect for the role physically as Hutcherson is not.

All in all, I did not think it was a good movie. I was disappointed. I will go see it again with people who have read the books so we can talk about it (and because I love seeing movies with my girlfriends), but I was sorely, sorely disappointed.

movies, Reviews

MI4 Ghost Protocol. Friendly Ghost or Scary Spooks?


B and I decided to go see a movie last night, and with our choices narrowed down to MI4, Sherlock 2, and Young Adult, we went with MI4.  Both of us had really enjoyed the first Mission Impossible, been aghast at the awfulness of 2, and skipped 3 altogether (which probably slowed us down in our understanding of the film, since there were no “previously” scenes.)  I will tell you right now that the absolute highlight of my movie-going experience was the unexpected delight of having Bruce Willis pop up in a trailer for GI Joe 2, which I will totally go see because Bruce Willis + The Rock = Awesomeness.  That being said, I thought MI4 was okay–not bad–enjoyable.

 

What I loved:

Nothing got me really excited, but one or two starts to stunt sequences caught me totally off guard and I loved being surprised.  Glad I went into this one mostly unspoiled–if you go in to this one spoiled, the movie is ruined.

I can’t say much about this without spoiling, so I will just say that I loved that the female characters weren’t “just girls”.  They were treated with equal weight to the male agents, kicked just as much rear, and took just as many names as everyone else.  And I was especially delighted that Patton’s character wasn’t your stereotypical femme fatale.

 

What I liked:

The stunts were outstanding.  And really, isn’t that why you go to an MI movie?  You’re sure not going for the believable story lines, the great acting, and the technical accuracy (because NOTHING in this movie is even remotely believable.  You’ll even start questioning Simon Pegg’s accent.)  Even knowing that the characters were making it through to at least the next scene (based on trailers alone–way to spoil your own movie, guys) I was at the edge of my seat for three stunts.

Simon Pegg and Jeremy Renner.  These two have a scene together that plays like the gravediggers in Hamlet against the backdrop of the movie, and even though they were both practically waving signs reading COMIC RELIEF, I giggled at them.  Renner, as the agent gone desk jockey returned to agency is the least of the truly bad acting in the movie, and if the editing had been better, I’d have believed him a lot more.

 

What I didn’t like:

I am usually able to get right into a movie and enjoy it for the story without paying attention to things like editing, or blocking, or direction, but as soon as we were past the Ethan Hunt entrance (which played very well), it was all I could see.  In several scenes (Paula Patton, leaning over a dying agent/Cruise, Renner, Patton, and Peg standing for dialog/Patton and Cruise getting out of a car/Renner giving his character’s back story/And a painfully long, obviously choreographed stunt sequence) you can read the stage direction right along with the actor.  The angles are unnatural in conversation to allow for no backs to the camera, but I haven’t seen such obvious blocking since the Golden Girls sat scrunched around their table for cheesecake, leaving an open seat for Elijah or something.

I would not go so far as to call Patton’s acting execrable, but Denise Richards was more natural as Dr. Christmas Snow.  There was some serious smell-the-fart acting going on with her.  Renner was so far out of this cast’s league that he seemed to be in a different movie.  Pegg was Pegg, and Cruise was Cruise, so that they might as well have just called one another Simon and Tom.  That’s not necessarily a bad thing in Pegg’s case, as likable and twinkling dark fun as he is, but for Cruise?  Well, when we were leaving the theater I told B that I wished I could still watch and enjoy Tom Cruise movies without thinking about Tom Cruise (who needs to keep his shirt on so badly.)  Again, the acting isn’t why you go to one of these movies, so as bad as some of it was, it wasn’t important.

 

What I Hated:

Those effing masks.  Don’t even joke with me about those effing masks, Tom Cruise.  I haven’t forgiven you for MI2.

 

Why You Should See It:

If you enjoy action movies at all, you’ll enjoy this.  It is wall to wall action and stunts with what amount to commercial breaks of  acting and dialog in between.  There is very little gore violence (yay!), no nudity, and the language is very clean, so if your younger tween likes car crashes and you don’t mind letting him/her see some well choreographed fight scenes, you could take a fairly young one to the movie.  They are going to see worse violence on television, but nowhere near the awesomeness of car/building/city destruction.

The theme of the movie is teamwork.  Honest to dog, I turned to B during a final wrap-up scene and sang to him from the WonderPets theme, “What’s gonna work?  Teeeeaaaaamwork!”  Aside from that cheesy bit of ham-fisted foolery in dialog, I thought the theme worked nicely for a 12-14 year old audience–maybe even 10 or 11 depending on your child’s level of video game play.  I would probably let Thor watch this at around 12.

In hindsight, it felt a lot like an episode of Chuck on steroids, so I enjoyed myself.  I love Chuck and am going to be so sad when it goes away.

 

In sum:  Go see MI4 for fun.  You won’t be sorry.  3.5 out of 5 stars from me.